• About
    • About RENSEP
    • Our Mission Statement
    • A Matrix of Esoteric Practices
    • Scientific Committee
    • Collaborations
  • Research
    • Research Agenda
    • Funded Research
    • Current RENSEP Grants
  • Praxis-Knowledge
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Praxis-Knowledge 1
    • Praxis-Knowledge 2
    • Praxis-Knowledge 3
  • Database
    • Submit Your Experience Report
  • News
  • Join Us
    • Concessionary Membership Rates
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Sign in
    Sign in Sign up
    • About
      • About RENSEP
      • Our Mission Statement
      • A Matrix of Esoteric Practices
      • Scientific Committee
      • Collaborations
    • Research
      • Research Agenda
      • Funded Research
      • Current RENSEP Grants
    • Praxis-Knowledge
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Praxis-Knowledge 1
      • Praxis-Knowledge 2
      • Praxis-Knowledge 3
    • Database
      • Submit Your Experience Report
    • News
    • Join Us
      • Concessionary Membership Rates
    • Contact Us
    • Donate
    • Sign in
    Home » Archives for September 2025

    Persian Magick: Bridging Ancient Tradition and Contemporary Practice

    This content is for Regular Member per year members only.
    Login Join Now

    RENSEP at the XXIII IAHR CONGRESS

    This August, RENSEP’s founders Andrea Centore and Bernd-Christian Otto, as well as RENSEP board member Cavan McLaughlin participated as speakers at the XXII IAHR CONGRESS at Jagiellonian University in Poland. 

    The overarching theme of the congress was “OUT OF EUROPE: Studying Religion(s) in Interconnected Worlds” and all three presenters affiliated with RENSEP spoke in Panel 9: “Are the Gates Open? The Insider/Outsider Debate in the Study of Esotericism”. This panel addressed, among other things, the relevance of exchange between scholars and practitioners within the academic study of esotericism, the rising interest in anthropological approaches within the field and the emerging figure of the ‘scholar-practitioner’. These topics were explored through several case studies, some of which focused on RENSEP and its’ practice-oriented mission. 

    Andrea Centore’s paper, “Co-Producing Knowledge in the Study of Esotericism: The Research Network for the Study of Esoteric Practices (RENSEP) and the Reconfiguration of the Insider/Outsider Debate”, positioned RENSEP as a case study for rethinking how scholarship and practitioner perspectives can be brought into dialogue. Against the backdrop of the “practical turn” in the study of esotericism, Centore highlighted how RENSEP fosters collaboration across academic and practitioner communities within a global, transdisciplinary framework – one that investigates the productive overlaps, tensions, and asymmetries across diverse epistemic registers. By emphasising esoteric practices and praxis-knowledge, his contribution examined strategies for negotiating emic and etic perspectives without compromising methodological rigour. Ultimately, Centore argued that RENSEP’s model does more than merely expand the methodological toolkit; it reshapes the very conditions under which academic knowledge of esoteric practices is produced. In doing so, it offers a blueprint for scholarship that is more inclusive, pluralistic, and collaborative, while opening new perspectives on how to reframe the insider/outsider debate within the field.

    Bernd-Christian Otto’s paper, “Practitioner-Scholarship and the Insider/Outsider Debate in the Study of Esotericism”, examined the implications of the recent “practice turn” for methodology in the field. Drawing on initiatives such as Trans-States and RENSEP, Otto highlighted how new collaborative approaches challenge traditional boundaries between scholarship and practice while also questioning long-standing stereotypes of the practitioner-scholar. He emphasised the urgent need for a systematic framework for practitioner-scholarship and proposed a methodology rooted in radical agnosticism, reflexive self-observation, and sense-oriented autoethnography. This approach, he argued, enables the production of rigorous research data while avoiding the shortcomings of earlier phenomenological or religionist models, and thereby offering a more robust foundation for future scholarship.

    Cavan McLaughlin’s presentation, “Trans-States and ‘Enic’ Practitioner-Scholar Transpositionality”, drew on findings from his practice-based PhD thesis, which included the founding of the Trans-States research network and art collective. He critically examined the dynamics between practitioners and scholars in the study of esotericism, contrasting traditional methodological conservatism with the more open approaches of cultural and arts-based research. Highlighting the intersections between artists and esoteric practitioners, McLaughlin argued for an “enic” perspective that acknowledges subjective experience while maintaining critical reflexivity. His work underscored the value of practitioner-scholarship and called for more inclusive, collaborative, and interdisciplinary methodologies that bridge academia, occulture, and lived practice.

    Together, the three contributions showcased RENSEP’s commitment to fostering critical, interdisciplinary, and inclusive approaches to the study of esotericism. Their presence at the congress also highlighted the network’s growing role in shaping international debates in the field.

    Research Network for the Study of Esoteric Practices
    © 2025 -
    • About
    • Research
    • Praxis-Knowledge
    • Database
    • News
    • Join Us
    • Contact Us
    • Donate
    • FAQ

    Privacy Notice | Cookies Notice

    Research Network for the Study of Esoteric Practices
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}

    Report

    There was a problem reporting this post.

    Harassment or bullying behavior
    Contains mature or sensitive content
    Contains misleading or false information
    Contains abusive or derogatory content
    Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

    Block Member?

    Please confirm you want to block this member.

    You will no longer be able to:

    • See blocked member's posts
    • Mention this member in posts
    • Invite this member to groups
    • Message this member
    • Add this member as a connection

    Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

    Report

    You have already reported this .